Telangana High Court seeks petitioners’ stance

A two judge panel of the Telangana HC comprising Justice Ujjal Bhuyan and Justice Surepalli Nanda asked for the stance of the petitioners within the hearing of a writ petition questioning a rule of the Telangana State Judicial Service and Cadre Rules 2017 that fixed a minimum age of 35 years just in case} of the Open Category and 40 years in case of persons belonging to the SC, ST and Backward Classes category and required percentage of marks during a academic degree to qualify sure positions within the Judicial Services. 

The petition further challenged a notification issued by the Telangana court extending the above qualifications for the post of Junior Civil Judge.

The panel was handling a petition filed by Swapna Gumpula and 99 others. Two petitioners withdrew from the said petition today because they crossed the regulation. The petitioners contended that the said orders were violative of Articles of the Constitution of India and contrary to the judgements of the Apex Court.

The petitioners requested the court to permit a law graduate to use to the posts concerned with or without experience. The counsel for the govt informed the court that a date for the examination was yet to be scheduled. The panel will still hear the matter on July 18.

Justice Abhinand Kumar Shavili of the Telangana state supreme court on Friday dispensed the looks of Somesh Kumar, Commissioner of Land Administration Special Chief Secretary to the govt of Telangana.

A contempt case was filed by the IAS for the willful disobedience and disrespect shown to the orders of the court. Earlier, a writ petition was filed in 2020 which was disposed after directing the Somesh Kumar, IAS to finalise the seniority list within the cadre of Deputy Collectors within an affordable period of your time, preferably within four months. The judge adjourned the interest July 8 for further hearing.

Justice Abhinand Kumar Shavili of the Telangana supreme court on Friday directed the Chairman of insurance Corporation of India et al to think about the appointment to the posts of peons within the current vacancies. A contempt case was filed against Chairman of life assurance Corporation of India, Zonal Manager and Senior Divisional Manager for his or her willful disobedience and violation of the orders of the court.

A writ plea was filed in 2012 by Vijay Kumar et al. for appointment as peon on account of non-joining / disqualification / leaving the corporation. The judge observed that the corporation considered the case of the petitioners only against the 50 vacancies of non-joined posts within 2 weeks. The judge adjourned the touch July 22 for hearing.